THE SOOKE POLICE BELIEVED ANYTHING BAD ANYONE HAD TO SAY ABOUT ME WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE EVER BEING OFFERED TO PROVIDE REASONABLE AND PROBABLE GROUNDS TO BELIEVE ANYTHING BAD ABOUT ME.
MY WIFE DEFAMED ME TO POLICE, AS SHE WAS ADVISED TO DO BY HER LAWYER TYLER LUCCIES. MY WIFE NOT ONLY SAID "YOU DON'T KNOW THE THINGS HE HAS GOTTEN AWAY WITH" AND ``HE IS CRAZY, HE THINKS HE IS GOING TO BE A ROCK STAR`` BUT ALSO SAID `` TARGET HIS MUSIC, IT IS ALL HE CARES ABOUT``. SHE ALSO SAID "HE HATES POLICE AND LAWYERS". RIGHT AWAY THE DEVALUATORS OF THE SERIOUS , TRUTHFUL AND PROVEABLE NATURE OF MY LITIGATION BEGIN. PEOPLE WOULD DEFEND A CRIME ADVANCING THE OFFENSIVE CANARD "YOU CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING" WHICH IGNORES THE REALITIES OF CIVIL LITIGATION AND IS NOT A CIVIL DEFENSE. IT IS AN INVOCATION OF THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE POSTURE AND IT IS TANTAMOUNT TO AN ADMISSION OF GUILTY KNOWLEDGE IN CIVIL COURT. PS:FACEBOOK: TO BE POLITIC ROCKER, I COULD NOT LIE, CHEAT, STEAL, OR HURT ANYONE. I CAN PROVE THAT THE STATEMENTS WERE MADE AND EVEN ACTED UPON TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DEGREE OF PROOF REQUIRED IN CIVIL COURT. IN ADDITION, DESTROYING, TAKING O